Obtain the data you need to make the most informed decisions by accessing our extensive portfolio of information, analytics, and expertise. Sign in to the product or service center of your choice.
While the EU and the UK hailed a "sustainable low-carbon energy"
breakthrough via a longer sustained nuclear fusion reaction, it is
still too early to say how significant the actual impact will
be.
The joint 9 February announcement stops short of
confirming the technology will be ready to use to meet their Paris
Agreement-aligned net-zero goals.
Nuclear fusion is widely considered a safer and cleaner
technology than traditional nuclear power, but it will not have a
big role in reaching net-zero because the move from demonstration
to global implementation will take decades, meaning it is no
"silver bullet" for the climate crisis, Director of the Climate
Science Center at Texas Tech University Katharine Hayhoe said in a
tweet.
Likewise, UK member of parliament Wera Hobhouse said, "It would be misleading to
look at nuclear fusion as a solution to the climate emergency.
These technologies are a long way away from being of use as an
energy source in time for our net zero targets by 2050."
Last year, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) said "a
pilot plant in the 2035-2040 timeframe requires urgent investments
by the Department of Energy (DOE) and private industry." The NRC
expects developers to decide to build the first fusion power plant
with a capacity in excess of 50 MWe by 2045.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has noted that
estimates for fusion's commercialization range from 2030 to 2050,
and beyond.
Traditional nuclear energy was recently added to the EU's
sustainable finance guidelines, the EU Taxonomy, as a key
energy transition technology. The power source is headed for an
investment boost as the guidelines update EU financial
regulations.
The UK is hoping to get ahead of the investment curve through
subsidies. In October the UK launched its Fusion Strategy to kickstart a
domestic nuclear fusion industry, with commercialization in the
2030s and 2040s, alongside a consultation on regulations for
nuclear fusion, dealing with issues like risk insurance and
waste.
Not only is a fusion reaction carbon-free (emitting only
helium), but the deuterium fuel used in fusion reactions is easily
found in nature, the strategy noted.
But Michael Bluck, director of the Centre for Nuclear
Engineering at Imperial College London, said that one material,
tritium, is required for larger reactions and is rare to find
naturally. Tritium is made using lithium.
The UK expects to both build a homegrown nuclear fusion
technology sector for exports and show off a domestic commercial
fusion power plant prototype by 2040.
Funding for this is laid out in the UK's 2021 R&D roadmap, which sees it
spending £22 billion ($30 billion) per year by 2024 or 2025. It
aims to be "at the forefront of global markets for clean
technology."
The UK is already among the top countries globally for offshore
wind capacity, but it is also pursuing a role in carbon capture,
usage and storage (CCUS), hydrogen, zero-emission vehicles, and
zero-carbon industry, as well as nature-based carbon offsets.
Stepping-stone experiment
The EU-funded UK project this week set a new record for
sustained fusion energy, doubling the length of time it was
sustained by the same facility in 1997.
The fusion was sustained for five seconds, longer than the
fraction-of-a-second fusion achieved at the DOE's National Ignition
Facility last year.
The work to create an energy source from nuclear fusion, the
process that illuminates stars, was carried out using the Joint
European Torus (JET) device at a center run by the UK Atomic Energy
Authority.
Past work at the UK facility has been carried out
collaboratively with researchers planning the first
commercial-scale fusion machine, the ITER tokamak in St.
Paul-les-Durance in France, and is also a collaboration of 35
countries including China, India, Japan, South Korea, Russia, and
the US.
Backers of the 40-year old ITER project originally envisaged it would become the first
demonstration-scale fusion reactor when it produces "first plasma"
in November 2025, but this has reportedly been delayed to 2026
or 2027 due to late component deliveries. The same milestone was
also delayed in 2016.
"The experiments at JET are absolutely crucial stepping-stones
towards realizing commercial fusion power," Martin Freer, a nuclear
physicist and Director of the Birmingham Energy Institute (BEI) at
the University of Birmingham, told Net-Zero Business
Daily.
The main upshot of the recent breakthrough is that it builds
confidence that the larger ITER experiment in France will be
successful in showing commercial fusion power stations are
possible, he said. But he warned that it was "not all plain
sailing" as engineers and researchers still must show that energy
created via fusion can also be efficiently extracted.
In September, American company Commonwealth Fusion Systems and
researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology said they tested the "world's
strongest high-temperature superconducting magnet." That project is
looking to demonstrate a 200-MW nuclear fusion power plant by
2030.
The researchers expect that nuclear fusion could generate power
at 5 cents per kilowatt-hour, the approximate price of solar
power.