Obtain the data you need to make the most informed decisions by accessing our extensive portfolio of information, analytics, and expertise. Sign in to the product or service center of your choice.
A slim majority of shareholders at ExxonMobil adopted a
resolution 25 May that requires oil giant to report on how a
net-zero future envisioned by the International Energy Agency (IEA)
would devalue the company's fossil fuel investments.
Approximately 52% of the votes were cast in favor of the
resolution offered by Christian Brothers Investment Services
(CBIS), an investment firm serving Catholic institutions.
The resolution asked ExxonMobil to report by February 2023 on
how the IEA's net-zero roadmap would affect the company's
"assumptions, costs, estimates, and valuations underlying its
financial statements, including those related to long-term
commodity and carbon prices, remaining asset lives, future asset
retirement obligations, capital expenditures, and impairments."
ExxonMobil's board recommended voting against the
CBIS resolution in its March proxy statement, calling it
"unnecessary."
CEO Darren Woods also noted that the company has already used
the IEA Net-Zero Scenario analysis in its 2022 progress report on
Advanced Climate Solutions.
Presenting the resolution at the meeting, however, CBIS Chief
Investment Officer John Geissinger said investors are concerned
about the new investments that ExxonMobil is making despite the IEA's 2021 scenario analysis
revealing that no investment in new fossil fuel supply projects is
needed in a net-zero scenario. Moreover, Geissinger noted that the
IEA anticipated oil prices dropping as low as $36/b in 2030 and
$24/b in 2050.
"Immediate action"
In that analysis, the IEA called for "immediate action" to
shelve oil and natural gas production projects yet to be committed
to as of 2021 "to begin an unprecedented transformation of how
energy is produced, transported, and used worldwide."
And yet, Geissinger said, ExxonMobil is continuing with new
fossil fuel investments, while failing to transparently account for
the future depreciation for such assets.
ExxonMobil earned $23 billion in profits in 2021, Woods said,
making no bones about the company's plans to move forward with oil
exploration activities in Guyana, while committing to low-carbon
solutions. At the start of the meeting, Woods said the company
already has two operational oil fields, two more in development,
and has made discoveries that could boost the estimated recoverable
resource to nearly 11 billion barrels of oil equivalent.
Moreover, Woods said the company expects to increase its Permian
Basin production by at least 550,000 b/d, which would mark a 25%
increase over what it added in 2021.
Energy plays a fundamental role
Reminding everyone of the fundamental role energy plays, Woods
said: "We have opportunities to play a leading role in helping
society achieve its net-zero ambitions and in meeting the world's
growing demand for energy and essential products."
He emphasized that ExxonMobil sees its role to be investing in
low-carbon technologies, such as hydrogen and carbon capture and
storage, and in producing biofuels where it has "a comparative
advantage."
ExxonMobil already has announced plans to set up a
hydrogen production plant at its Baytown petrochemical facility in
Texas. This plant also will be equipped with the ability to capture
CO2 and transport it to a storage hub in the Gulf Coast
region it is planning with 13 other oil majors, petrochemical and
chemical manufacturers, and utilities as part of a $100-billion
carbon capture and storage hub.
Without naming the Russian invasion of Ukraine, he added that
"recent events have reminded us how globally connected energy
markets are. They've also underscored the importance of our role in
creating sustainable solutions that improve quality of life, while
supporting a lower-emissions future."
In the vote on the CBIS resolution, Geissinger said,
shareholders have made clear to ExxonMobil's board it can no longer
delay "serious consideration" of the impact on its business of
global efforts to address climate change.
"The company must face the reality that nations worldwide are
committing to reduce carbon emissions to net zero by 2050, and
quantify for investors the potential effects in its financial
statements," Geissinger said in a 25 May statement to Net-Zero
Business Daily by S&P Global Commodity Insights.
This is the second year in a row that shareholders have spoken,
after the proposal received a 49% share of the vote in 2021, he
added.
"As the industry and its regulators move towards enhanced
visibility of material and systemic risks of climate change, the
generalities that ExxonMobil has been providing regarding how the
company might manage its assets or shift investments in a Net-Zero
analysis are no longer sufficient and gives us no indication if
Exxon would be resilient to accelerating decarbonization," he
said.
Scope 3 resolution fails
Apart from the CBIS resolution, all other climate-related
resolutions were unsuccessful.
A resolution from Amsterdam-based activist shareholder group
Follow This received only 28.1% of the vote. This resolution, which
the ExxonMobil board did not support, would have seen
the Houston-based company set GHG reduction targets across the
value chain of its products based on the 2015 Paris Agreement goal
to limit global warming below 1.5 degrees Celsius.
Specifically, Follow This wanted ExxonMobil to set reduction
targets for scopes 1, 2, and 3 emissions in alignment with the 2015
treaty.
Scope 3 emissions are GHGs generated across the entire value
chain of creating an end product, beginning with sourcing the raw
materials, and continuing through manufacturing, transportation,
and using the product. Scope 1 refers to direct releases from
production activity, while Scope 2 refers to the emissions released
through purchases of heat and power for its operations.
During a discussion on the Follow This resolution, Woods said
ExxonMobil already had committed to investing $15 billion in
low-carbon solutions that will not only help reduce emissions
across the value chain, but also those of its customers.
"In fact," Woods said, "we are concerned that a target for Scope
3 emissions on individual companies could have the opposite
effect."
He said every additional ton of natural gas that ExxonMobil
produces replaces coal, which is more GHG intensive than natural
gas. Even though ExxonMobil may be increasing its Scope 3
emissions, society as a whole is benefitting from fewer GHG
emissions, Woods said.
Also unsuccessful was a resolution seeking an audited report on
whether ExxonMobil, which is the largest producer of single-use
plastic, would be affected if there's a significant reduction in
this product's demand.
Posted 25 May 2022 by Amena Saiyid, Senior Climate and Energy Research Analyst
This article was published by S&P Global Commodity Insights and not by S&P Global Ratings, which is a separately managed division of S&P Global.