Obtain the data you need to make the most informed decisions by accessing our extensive portfolio of information, analytics, and expertise. Sign in to the product or service center of your choice.
US commonwealth Puerto Rico is striving for a fossil fuel-free
power sector by 2050, with an interim goal of sourcing 40% of its
electricity from renewables in 2025.
The goal may prove to be insurmountable unless the island is
able to make major upgrades to its power grid and rapidly install
new capacity, given that renewables provided just 2.5% of its power in 2020,
according to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA).
Clean energy advocates say Puerto Rico can achieve this goal if
the island is wise when spending the $20-billion-plus that the US
Congress has approved for the island's recovery from two hurricanes
in 2017. However, standing in the way of this transformation are
technological challenges, entrenched interests, political
instability, a bankrupt utility company, a financial oversight
board, and more, according to experts interviewed by IHS
Markit.
Living in a different world
Puerto Rico is a US territory with 3.1 million residents. But
when it comes to energy, Puerto Ricans are living in a different
world from their mainland peers. Puerto Ricans consume one-third
less power, on average, than residents in the continental US, but
pay among the highest US electricity rates, according to EIA.
What's more, EIA data show that Puerto Rico in fiscal year 2020
generated more power from fossil fuels than any US state, obtaining
49% of its power from oil, 29% from natural gas, and 19% from coal,
as well as the renewables share (mostly hydropower).
Regardless of the power source, Puerto Rico's power grid is not
prepared for climate-fueled storms. The island's energy woes
reached their zenith in September 2017, when two hurricanes, Irma
and Maria, battered the island. Maria, a category 5 storm, knocked
out nearly 100% of the nation's power for a week by damaging coal,
oil, and gas-fired power plants and wind turbines, downing 80% of
the transmission grid, and destroying nearly half of the island's
334 power substations, according to a US Army Corps of Engineers
report to Congress in 2018.
"It took roughly 11 months for power to be restored to all
customers with structures deemed safe for power restoration," the
Government Accountability Office stated in a
report in 2019.
Unfortunately, not long after the grid returned to relatively
normal functionality, Puerto Rico experienced a 6.4 magnitude
earthquake in January 2020, followed by aftershocks and a
5.4-magnitude earthquake in May. "The earthquake and aftershocks
left two-thirds of Puerto Rico's residents without power and
significantly damaged the island's two largest power plants. The US
Geological Survey estimates that aftershocks could continue for
years," EIA reported.
The earthquakes revealed "the fragility of the system in
general," wrote Sergio Marxuach, an expert in energy policy at the
Puerto Rican think tank Center for a New Economy.
Primed for change
With recovery funds available, now is the time for
transformation, according to PJ Wilson, president, Solar + Energy
Storage Association of Puerto Rico (SESA). He said the "three legs
to the stool" that the island needs are coming into focus:
political willpower, funding, and a plan.
"We now have that willpower at the federal level and at the
Puerto Rico level," Wilson said, referring to support from the
Biden administration and Congress as well as Puerto Rico's new
governor, Pedro Pierluisi, who assumed office on 4 January
2021.
"We are going to take advantage of every federal dollar —
and we're going to do it now," Peirluisi said in his January
inaugural address.
Indeed, for the first time, Puerto Rico has access to the funds
to accomplish the job, or at least a large share of it. In the wake
of the hurricanes, Congress appropriated $16 billion in spending on
housing and related issues through the Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) agency, of which an initial $2 billion was
designated for "enhanced or improved electrical power systems."
Congress also gave the island $9.6 billion through the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for recovery and resiliency. If
these funds are spent on home energy efficiency, renewables, and
grid improvements, the island's energy picture could look radically
different. "I think that's the best news yet for Puerto Rico … if
the programs are designed well and the funding actually flows,"
Wilson said.
It's a massive opportunity, said Cathy Kunkel, who co-authored a
report on Puerto Rico's energy options for the Institute for Energy
Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA), which studies energy
issues. "The FEMA money is very important; having billions to
rebuild your energy infrastructure doesn't happen every day," she
said.
Energy and financial politics
However, the island's energy and financial politics are
complicating any reform. It starts with the Puerto Rico Electric
Power Authority (PREPA), the government-owned utility, which owns
4.9 GW of Puerto Rico's 6.1 GW of power generation capacity, and
handles distribution for about 950 MW of independent power capacity
as well, through its network of 2,400 miles of transmission lines
and more than 30,000 miles of distribution lines.
PREPA declared bankruptcy in July 2017 with more than $9 billion
in debt. A report by the Financial Oversight and Management Board
for Puerto Rico, published in August 2020, highlighted years of
political meddling and mismanagement of the power grid by PREPA
prior to the 2017 crisis.
In a series of bond offerings in 2008 and 2012, PREPA pulled in
billions of dollars to modernize its grid and convert to gas-fired
power, but the report found little oversight of how the funds were
spent, as well as changing priorities each time a new political
party gained power. PREPA "simultaneously kept the rates [to
consumers] high, and yet, insufficient to cover operational
expenses and capital improvement projects," the report said.
IHS Markit was unable to schedule an interview with PREPA
representatives over a period of weeks.
The Financial Oversight and Management Board was created by
Congress in 2016 to address an even larger financial problem:
Puerto Rico's need to restructure more than $100 billion in debt.
And it is just one of several entities to which PREPA must answer,
including FEMA, the Puerto Rico Energy Board, and the Puerto Rico
Central Office for Recovery, Reconstruction and Resiliency
(Cor3).
Cor3 has its own estimate of the cost to
rebuild the power system at more than $20 billion (see table).
Published in 2018, it's reliant on expanding the bulk power system
and protecting it from weather damage.
PREPA's 10-year plan
The back-and-forth discussion of PREPA's "10-Year Infrastructure Plan"
illustrates the difficulty of developing the energy roadmap that
SESA's Wilson described.
PREPA submitted its $10.7-billion plan in December 2020 to
multiple agencies. The plan included the addition of 3.75 GW of
renewable power, backed up with 1.5 GW of battery storage; building
a 400-MW gas-fired power unit at the existing Palo Seco facility;
and adding 330 MW of new gas-fired peaker units. Most of the funds
would flow to PREPA from FEMA and HUD.
To enhance resilience, the plan envisioned dividing the island
into eight mini-grids, each of which would have a dedicated power
supply, interconnections with other mini-grids, and battery storage
(see map). This approach also is favored by Cor3.
PREPA's mini-grid plan is similar to recommendations from the US Department of Energy in a
September 2018 report.
In December 2020, the Energy Bureau of Puerto Rico
partly accepted the 10-year plan's focus on renewables, but it
rejected the addition of more gas-fired plants. The energy bureau
told PREPA that "increased deployment of solar PV and battery
resources should be pursued," compared with PREPA's preferred plan
and that the proposals for gas peakers should be dropped "because
it failed to demonstrate that they are needed." The regulator
expressed skepticism about the need for the 400-MW gas unit at Palo
Seco, but authorized spending $5 million on economic, siting,
permitting, and planning for the project.
Meanwhile, the plan remains under review, as required by US
federal law, by FEMA and the Cor3 agency.
As part of the plan, PREPA announced on 28 January 2021 a
request for proposals (RFP) for 1 GW of PV capacity and 500 MW of
battery storage, which would be the first of six solicitations over
the next three years.
The RFP is superficially impressive because, if implemented, it
would create one of the largest battery story operations in the
world. For a sense of scale, the entire US electricity grid had
just 1.03 GW of storage as of the end of 2020, and Tesla's highly
publicized solar-plus-battery project in Australia that began
operation in July 2020 has storage capacity of 150 MW.
But it's a tall order for a utility that has been almost
exclusively focused on fossil fuel power. "To outsiders, it might
seem like PREPA is going to do something big," said Wilson. "But
it's … traditionally [been] anti-renewables and has never done much
in energy efficiency. We are waiting to see the results here."
In fact, there are early signs are that the RFP is less than it
appears to be. For example, despite saying that it is soliciting
for 1 GW of renewable power, PREPA stated that the grid can support
only 650 MW of new renewable capacity unless transmission lines and
control systems are upgraded — expenditures not yet
approved.
To further complicate matters, grid upgrades soon will be taken
out of PREPA's hands. As of 1 June 2021, LUMA Energy, a private
company, is scheduled to take over management and ownership of the
transmission network. LUMA was selected and given a 15-year
contract by the Puerto Rico Public-Private Partnership Authority,
another of the many entities with a hand in deciding the
commonwealth's energy investments.
LUMA is facing a tall task, IEEFA noted in an analysis in
October 2020. "The rebuilding of Puerto Rico's grid is estimated to
cost more than $20 billion, largely financed with federal dollars.
The two companies that sponsor LUMA -- Quanta Services and ATCO --
are worth about $12 billion. These companies are too small to meet
the challenge in Puerto Rico," it said.
As recently as this week, uncertainty swirled over the
privatization that is supposed to commence in less than two months.
PREPA workers would lose state protections under LUMA's management,
and their influence led the legislature to pass a resolution on 7
April to delay the privatization until 1 January 2022 so that the
contract can be renegotiated to protect workers. Later on the same
day, in his first "State of the Government" address, Pierluisi said
that he supports amending the LUMA contract, but opposes any delay
in the turnover.
The uncertainties over grid management bring to mind other types
of difficulties that have bedeviled renewable power projects in
Puerto Rico for a decade, Wilson said. Nearly 10 years ago, PREPA
announced an RFP for 1.6 GW of renewable power. It selected 64
projects with a total of nearly 600 MW of capacity, and 16 of them
reached the shovel-ready stage. But none saw the light of day. As
the projects were delayed, PREPA renegotiated the rate of the
original power purchase agreements from 18 cents/kWh down to 10
cents/kWh in 2020, but the financial oversight board rejected the
revised agreements.
"So, why should companies bid on the 1,000-MW RFP now?" Wilson
asked.
Bids on the renewables RFP are due on 3 May.
A decentralized power option
Within months of the hurricanes, Congress approved about $43
billion for Puerto Rico's recovery, including funds for other
support beyond energy and resilience. But decisions by agencies and
President Donald Trump slowed the release of most of those funds,
with a HUD inspector general investigation finding less than
one-third of the agency's allocation had been distributed by
October 2019.
Ironically, those delays could now work in favor of a more rapid
and creative approach. The Biden administration is moving quickly,
as a pair of administrative directives in January and February
released an additional $6.2 billion of HUD funds.
As much as the money itself, the island will benefit from
flexibility about how to use the investments. "We have indications
from FEMA that renewable energy storage is fine for use of FEMA
money," Kunkel said. This would be a contrast to PREPA's plan to
spend funds primarily on hardening the grid by burying power lines
underground and protecting substations from storms and floods.
With the new administration in mind, IEEFA released a study in
March 2021 that looks at a new way to solve the problem. Instead of
PREPA's and Cor3's plans to rely on the traditional bulk power
system, but with better backup, IEEFA has a more radical idea:
invest recovery funds in rooftop solar, backed with battery storage
in a "decentralized" approach. IEEFA
argues decentralized power would reduce the stress on the
transmission network and allow for the closure of fossil fuel-fired
power sources — simultaneously delivering more reliable and
cleaner power, at a lower and more predictable cost.
One lesson learned from 2017, Kunkel said, is that, "Whatever
power the transmission lines are carrying doesn't matter if they
fail. That's why we have such an interest in distributed rooftop
solar with battery storage."
Energy efficiency also has a major role to play. Puerto Rico's
power load in 2020 was 16,548 GWh, according to EIA. IEEFA says
that power demand could be reduced by 25% to 11,736 GWh by 2035
through energy efficiency measures. While that might seem like an
aggressive goal, PREPA had forecast demand of 13,000 GWh in 2026,
prior to the hurricanes, as it too saw opportunities for
significant efficiency measures.
To supply that power load in 2035, IEEFA considered a baseline
scenario of the current centralized, traditional power network, and
compared it with three scenarios: adding rooftop solar-plus-storage
to meet 25%, 50%, and 75% of the island's power needs. At 75%
distributed energy, that's about 1 million homes, as well as
installations at parking lots and other public buildings.
"The grid is still there and in normal operation. There is power
flowing. But if system goes down, decentralized power is not
affected," Kunkel said.
The study found that at 25% distributed energy, PREPA could
retire the oldest, dirtiest fossil fuel plants and reduce CO2
emissions by 35%. At 50% distributed energy, it's a 54%
reduction.
At the same time, Puerto Rico would wean itself off fuel
imports. At 25% distributed energy, the savings in fuel costs are
about $100 million per year in fuel, and at 50%, they are $354
million/year, according to IEEFA.
And this could be done for $9.6 billion, or less than the $10.7
billion that PREPA has proposed to spend in its 10-year plan.
For Puerto Ricans, shifting to renewables brings another
benefit, advocates say: cost stability. Currently, Puerto Rico's
power prices are adjusted every three months, with a rider that
reflects the cost of fuel imports. This is a highly sensitive issue
for residents who have low incomes, and, as the financial oversight
board observed, PREPA has often received pushback to reduce its
rates.
The most recent rate request is a perfect example, Wilson
explained. In February 2021, PREPA asked for a rate increase of 2.7
cents/kWh to reflect rising global prices for oil and gas. But the
Puerto Rico Energy Board rejected the rider. The board issued a
statement at the time that Wilson translated for IHS Markit as: "…
in the long term, we have to stop being dependent on fossil fuels,
and we have to switch to renewables."
PREPA came back two weeks later to say it will raise its rate by
just 1.1 cents/kWh, saying it could redirect FEMA funds to offset
the rest of the cost increase.
The next steps for Puerto Rico's energy picture have yet to
emerge. PREPA's 10-year plan remains under review, and bids to sell
energy under its new renewable power RFP are not due until next
month. Meanwhile, US funds are flowing to the commonwealth more
quickly, and from an administration that is favorable to renewable
power for climate reasons, as well as the creation of clean jobs.
So far, $300 million of HUD's spending has been approved for
energy-related projects, which Wilson said would transfer to about
15,000 rooftop solar-and-storage installations.
Concluded IEEFA: "Decisions over the use of billions of dollars
in federal funding will shape Puerto Rico's grid for decades to
come. A distributed energy future for the island is technically
achievable, affordable and would provide real resiliency to Puerto
Rico homes and businesses."