Obtain the data you need to make the most informed decisions by accessing our extensive portfolio of information, analytics, and expertise. Sign in to the product or service center of your choice.
A group of 28 mining companies, including some of the biggest
names in the sector, committed to net-zero Scope 1
and 2 GHG emissions by 2050 or sooner on 5 October.
Scope 1 emissions are direct emissions from sources controlled
by an organization. Scope 2 emissions are indirect emissions
associated with the purchase of power, steam, heat, or cooling.
Some of the companies, all of whom are members of the
International Council on Mining & Metals (ICMM), have already
committed to net-zero Scope 3 GHG emissions separately, and more
may do so in the future. Scope 3 emissions include all other
indirect emissions that occur in a company's value chain.
In addition to the 2050 pledge by the companies, they made a
nearer-term promise. The ICMM members said that no later than the
end of 2023, each would set Scope 1 and 2 pathways through short-
and/or medium-term targets and accelerate action on Scope 3
emissions.
"We recognize that Scope 3 is critical to minimizing our overall
impact and we will set Scope 3 targets, if not by the end of 2023,
as soon as possible. Although all Scope 3 action depends on the
combined efforts of producers, suppliers and customers, some
commodities face greater technological and collaborative barriers
than others," they said in a letter announcing the Scope 1 and 2
GHGs pledge.
The ICMM members also promised to focus on absolute reductions,
although "intensity rather than absolute targets may be more
appropriate in the short and medium term." They added that where
intensity targets are used, the companies will disclose the
corresponding absolute increase or decrease in GHG emissions.
Another sector with hard-to-abate emissions, maritime
transportation, is among those to receive criticism for focusing on
emissions intensity rather than absolute reductions.
On top of the other promises, the miners said they would report
their progress on scopes 1, 2 and 3 emissions annually, obtain
external verification of performance, and report in alignment with
the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial
Disclosures.
The companies putting their names to the pledge are: Hydro,
Freeport-McMoran, Antofagasta Minerals, Vale, Codelco, Newcrest
Mining, Barrick, AngloGold Ashanti, Anglo American, Sibanye
Stillwater, MMG, Polyus, Gold Fields, Alcoa, BHP, JX Nippon, South
32, Orano, Minsur, Teck, African Rainbow Minerals, Glencore,
Sumitomo Metal Mining, Minera San Cristobal, Newmont, Mitsubishi
Materials, Boliden, and Rio Tinto.
Hard-to-abate sector
Mining is a sector among those that will find it hard to abate
its emissions, observers say, with substantial amounts of fuel
required to extract the ore and then transport it in the first
place and then transform it downstream by smelting for instance.
Smelting typically requires large amounts of electricity.
In addition, mines are often in remote, harsh locations where
sourcing significant amounts of renewable energy onsite or
electricity via transmission lines can prove difficult and
expensive.
Still, as the COP26 climate change meeting approaches, the
miners' pledge won the backing of at least one key individual
attempting to smooth the path to a carbon neutral world in
2050.
Gonzalo Muñoz, UN Framework Convention on Climate Change High
Level Climate Action Champion, said: "I welcome the leadership and
joint ambition of ICMM members to commit to a goal of net-zero
Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions by 2050 or sooner, and I strongly
encourage companies to set Scope 3 GHG emissions reduction targets
by the end of 2023."
Scope 3
Some of the signatories already have, in some cases after
previously warning such a path was a fool's errand.
In February, Rio Tinto said it plans to tackle its
Scope 3 emissions. The company's stance was an about-face for a
company that in 2020 said considering such a goal was a bridge too far.
Rio Tinto is the largest iron ore miner by volume, according to
company filings. Much of that heads to China, the world's largest
steelmaker. Because steel is produced through an energy-intensive
manufacturing process that involves both iron ore and coal, Rio
Tinto Scope 3 emissions will be a substantial challenge to
tackle.
As part of Rio Tinto's efforts to tackle its Scope 3 emissions,
the Anglo-Australian firm said it was working with customers in the
steel industry, investing in technologies it believes can reduce
the carbon intensity of steelmaking by at least 30% from 2030, as
well as developing "breakthrough technologies with potential to
deliver carbon neutral steelmaking pathways by 2050."
The company also said it had teamed up with partners to enable
the production of zero-carbon aluminum, and hopes to reach net-zero
emissions from shipping of its products by 2050.
Glencore, which merged with coal to copper miner Xstrata in
2012, has also pledged to achieve net-zero Scope 1, 2 and 3
emissions by 2050. In its preliminary 2020 earnings statement in
February, Glencore said its Scope 3 CO2 emissions fell to 264,000
metric tons (mt) in 2020 from 347,000 mt in 2019, while its Scope 1
and 2 CO2 emissions fell to 24,300 mt in 2020 from 29,200 mt in
2019.
Tough sledding
IHS Markit Pricing and Purchasing Service Director John
Mothersole told Net-Zero Business Daily he was not surprised the
mining industry was setting out ambitious goals to reduce its GHG
emissions, given the increased focus on mining as an integral part
of a transition in energy markets over the next 25 years.
"I suspect the industry will come close to, if not meeting, its
target of net-zero emissions by 2050," he said. "The question to me
is at what cost."
Over the past 50 years, he said, productivity growth has allowed
real costs to remain steady or even continue to fall, so, the
challenge is whether the industry will be able to maintain this
record over the next 25 years.
Part of the problem will be the enormous mining trucks used,
especially at open cast operations. Models such as Caterpillar's
797 series carry over 400 mt of ore, with the latest 797F model
measuring 14.8 meters in length and 6.52 meters high while packing
a 4,000 horsepower (hp) diesel engine. In contrast, Ford's
SuperDuty F-350 heavy-duty truck —the big brother to the
best-selling F-150 model that is about to go electric—tops out at 475
hp.
As a result, the ICMM members said they planned to accelerate
the deployment of zero-emission mining vehicles in their operations
and the wider industry through the Innovation for Cleaner Safer
Vehicles initiative. The initiative brings ICMM members
together with original equipment manufacturers to develop a new
generation of mining vehicles
IHS Markit's Mothersole said there are challenges even in
achieving Scope 1 targets by 2040 in above-ground mining vehicles.
The energy density of the battery technology present today or
likely to be available over the next 10 years doesn't look able to
support mining operations at a cost the industry would see as
viable, he said.
With miners looking to run such vehicles around the clock, the
charging times required would imply a significant loss in
productivity, said Mothersole. The same arguments would apply to
loaders and excavators, he added.
One solution to the transportation fuel and electricity problem,
if it is scalable at cost, said Mothersole, may be green or blue
hydrogen. Green hydrogen production involves electrolysis using
power from renewable resources.
Activity in Australia, one of the world's foremost mining
centers, indicates the range of ideas that are being studied.
BP said a study into the
feasibility of an export-scale green hydrogen and ammonia
production plant in Western Australia found that production using
renewable energy is technically feasible at scale. BP is one of a
number of developers eyeing the state for
export-scale green hydrogen and ammonia projects.
But some are targeting customers relatively close to home as
well as abroad. InterContinental Energy and CWP Global proposed the
Asian Renewable Energy Hub
(AREH)—a 15-GW to 26-GW wind and solar facility that would
supply power to local industry and an up to 10 million mt ammonia
export project. AREH is to be located in northwestern Western
Australia's Pilbara region, an iron ore industry hub.
TotalEnergies-backed Total Eren, meanwhile, signed a memorandum of
understanding with Province Resources to carry out a feasibility
study for the Australian miner's Hyenergy project in the Gascoyne
region of northwestern Western Australia, which would utilize up to
8 GW of renewable electricity. The Gascoyne region is adjacent to
the Pilbara region.
These efforts to cut emissions are voluntary, but Australian
developers could be mandated to do so in the coming years,
including Scope 3 emissions, according to Jodie Wauchope of law
firm Dentons. In a recent article, Wauchope said a
court in the Australian state of New South Wales ruled that Scope 3
emissions must be addressed in environmental planning applications
by miners.