Obtain the data you need to make the most informed decisions by accessing our extensive portfolio of information, analytics, and expertise. Sign in to the product or service center of your choice.
At the US-organized climate summit in April, Japan made one of
the most substantial new GHG emissions reduction commitments,
raising its target to a 46% cut from a 2013 baseline—a goal
that seems aggressive, but achievable, based on the country's track
record over the last six years.
Japan's prior commitment was for a reduction of 26% from 2013
levels, backed by a net-zero commitment for 2050.
Japan's total GHG emissions in FY 2019 were 1,212 million mt
CO2e, a reduction of 2.9% from FY 2018, according to its annual emissions inventory
published in April. This represents a reduction in emissions of 15%
since FY 2013, according to information submitted to the United
Nations on 31 March as an update to Japan's nationally determined
contribution.
Previously, its goal for 2030 was 1,042 million mt
CO2-equivalent, but the new target will be about 761 million mt
CO2e.
"Their target before, relatively speaking, wasn't incredibly
ambitious," said Anna Mosby, IHS Markit principal research analyst.
"The new target is significantly more ambitious. They can meet this
new target if they maintain that pace," she said.
However, she added that under IHS Markit's global scenarios for
business-as-usual operations, "we do not see Japan meeting this
more aggressive target."
The new 2030 goal represents an aim to front-load emissions
reductions, as encouraged by the International Energy Agency and the United Nations in recent
reports. Yet, Japan will have to engage in new policies and/or
incentives to make it happen.
That was the promise of Hiroshi Kajiyama, head of the Ministry
of Economy, Trade, and Industry (METI), in comments on 23 April
after Japan's new goal had been announced at the Biden climate
summit. "We intend to increase renewable energy [generation] as
much as possible, and nuclear power will also constitute a share,
although there are reactors which have restarted, or not been
restarted amid some issues over trust," he said.
Japan uses 2013 as its baseline rather than the 2005 starting
point used by most countries because its 2013 CO2e emissions were
1,408 million mt, compared with 1,381 million mt in 2005. This
makes it slightly easier for Japan to achieve reductions on a
percentage basis, Mosby explained.
Power, transport sectors
Looking at the country's emissions profile today, Mosby said the
power sector, which includes power for manufacturing, is likely to
have to carry much of the added burden. "They have a lot of gas-
and coal-fired generation," she said. "Coal power is probably going
to be the largest single source [of emissions] that they have to
work on."
The GHG inventory for FY 2019 shows solid fuels (coal)
responsible for nearly 43% of Japan's CO2 emissions; liquid fuels
(refined products such as gasoline, diesel, and propane) at 37%;
and LNG and natural gas at 19%.
Prior to the recent announcement of the stiffer GHG target,
Japan was already seeking to reduce emissions from coal, headlined
by an announcement by METI in July 2020 that 100 pre-1995,
less-efficient coal-fired power plants will be closed by 2030. This
isn't the first time that coal seemed to be on its way out, as it
had dwindled a decade ago to providing about 15% of the nation's
annual energy production. But in the wake of the 2011 tsunami that
damaged the Fukushima plant, Japan closed its nuclear power plants
for safety reviews and has reopened only nine of them. Coal power
returned in force, accounting for about 33% of Japan's power in
2019, according to IHS Markit.
The good news about Japan's need to reduce emissions from the
power sector is that this is familiar territory for the world's
developed economies, as the US and many European countries have
demonstrated by shifting from coal power to natural gas and
renewables. "The power sector in general is the lowest-hanging
fruit in terms of emissions reductions because there are affordable
lower-carbon alternatives that countries are using at scale," Mosby
said.
Next in line is the transportation sector, which accounts for
nearly 22% of Japan's annual CO2e emissions (almost 237 million mt
CO2), according to IHS Markit. Half of that is light-duty vehicles,
followed by heavy-duty vehicles, aviation, and shipping.
The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) said Japan can and
should do more, given that it is the world's eighth-largest GHG
emitter and third-largest economy. "A target of only 45-46% below
2013 levels is not in line with what this moment demands. It is way
too low to be credible and serious. Instead, the Japanese
government should commit to a target of 52% below 2013 levels," it
said.
How will it get there?
Japan's government has not released details on how it will reach
its new emissions target, but a look at the country's "Green Growth
Strategy," which is its general plan for reaching net-zero
emissions in 2050, indicates what the strategies might be.
According to an English translation of the Green
Growth Strategy that was published in March, Japan is seeking to
triple its share of renewable power to 50% by 2050, is planning to
ban sales of new gasoline-only vehicles by 2035, and is trying to
rapidly develop a substantial hydrogen power industry. The strategy
includes reducing the cost of batteries so that by 2030 electric
vehicles will have cost parity with fuel vehicles, and also so that
"home-use storage batteries combined with solar panels make
economic sense."
METI subsequently announced in April that it's supporting the hydrogen industry with
investments of ¥370 billion ($3.4 billion) over the next 10 years.
A total of 18 projects were identified for funding in April, aimed
at reducing costs in the supply chain, improving efficiency of
electrolyzers that make hydrogen, and testing hydrogen-fired or
hydrogen and gas co-fired turbines. The ministry's goal is to bring
down the price of hydrogen production by two-thirds by 2030.
Japan expects its hydrogen demand will reach 3 million mt in
2030 and 20 million mt/year by 2050.
The Green Growth Strategy also envisions a rapid buildout of
offshore wind capacity to 10 GW by 2030 and 30-45 GW by 2040. On 11
May, GE Renewable Energy announced an alliance with Toshiba to
build and market GE's Haliade-X offshore wind turbine in Japan, the
latest private investment attracted to that space. In April,
Spanish renewables company Iberdrola and Japan's Cosmo Eco Power
and engineering firm Hitachi Zosen said they will bid on the rights
to build a 600-MW offshore wind
project.
Japan does have a carbon tax, but that tax rate is very low by
international standards, at just ¥289/mt of CO2e, or about $3/mt.
For now, the government has not announced plans to increase that
tax. Nor has it said it would expand a cap-and-trade emissions
trading program for the Tokyo metro region. Mosby pointed out that
the Tokyo cap-and-trade program affects only one part of the
country and does not include all sources of emissions, so its
impact at present is limited.
One open question is what will happen to Japan's nuclear power
industry. "For realization of 2050 carbon neutrality, it is
important to pursue every option including nuclear power," the
Green Growth Strategy stated. It identified as priorities
commercialization of small module reactor technology by 2030, use
of high-temperature gas-cooled reactors to produce hydrogen by
2030, and research and development for fusion energy.
In the more immediate term, IHS Markit sees challenges in
the nuclear sector. In a 2020 report, IHS Markit said that Japan's
goal of nuclear supplying 20-22% of power in 2030 would require
restarting 27 of the country's 58 nuclear plants, a far cry from
the nine operating today.
If nuclear does not meet that targeted threshold, the question
is whether renewables can be ramped up quickly enough to fill the
gap, IHS Markit said.
As a nation dependent on fuel imports, Japan is also at the
forefront of building a carbon-neutral LNG industry, as well as
converting ships to burn LNG. It's already experimenting with LNG
use to replace fuel oil in ferries, but longer term the Green
Growth Strategy states that its aims include "the commercial
operation of zero-emission ships by 2028 … and striving to further
spread those ships toward 2030. In 2050, the fuel used for ships is
expected to be converted alternative fuels such as hydrogen and
ammonia."
Coal power remains another open question. Even if the 100 most
inefficient plants are closed, METI estimates that Japan will still
rely on coal-fired power for about 26% of its electricity needs in
2030. In all, 48-50 GW of coal-fired power will likely still be
online.
However, Japan will seek to reduce emissions from these
facilities by applying new standards that will require 43% greater
efficiency in 2030 than today. METI has authorized construction of
21 new coal units in the next five to 10 years with a total
capacity of more than 12.5 GW, which would perform at high
efficiency and with low emissions.
Under the new GHG scenario, it's possible those coal investments
will be scaled back, or that plans by companies to exit the coal
business will be accelerated. To cite one example, trading house
Sumitomo announced on 7 May that it will close or sell all of its
coal mine assets by 2030 and exit the coal-fired power business by
2040 in Japan and abroad. Sumitomo supplied 4.4 million mt of
thermal coal from its mines during the April 2020-March 2021 fiscal
year; this was down by 25% from the prior year, with the company
attributing more than half of the shortfall to COVID-19 economic
impacts.