Obtain the data you need to make the most informed decisions by accessing our extensive portfolio of information, analytics, and expertise. Sign in to the product or service center of your choice.
Announcements by scores of international fossil fuel companies
this year that they are committed to reducing their carbon
footprint fall far short of the reductions needed to contain global
temperature increase 2°C by 2050, according to new research by the
Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI).
TPI found that just seven of 59 oil and gas and coal mining
companies have carbon pledges that would meet the emissions
reductions of the 2015 Paris Agreement: Glencore, Anglo American,
Shell, Repsol, Total, Eni and Equinor (all based in Europe).
"Moreover, those pledges are widely regarded as insufficient to
avert dangerous climate change (leaving the world on track for
3.2°C of warming according to UNEP)," TPI said when releasing its
report on 7 October 2020. "When judging companies' emissions
pathways against the more ambitious benchmark of limiting climate
change to 2°C or below, none of the 59 fossil fuel companies were
found to be aligned, although three oil and gas companies are
approaching a 2°C pathway (Shell, Total & Eni) but still need
further measures to be assessed to align with this benchmark.
Thanks to heavy regulation of the power sector and the
advancement of renewable technology, power producers are ahead of
other parts of the energy industry in addressing climate change,
said Simon Dietz, author of the study. "The core business model is
not under threat. For oil & gas companies, the route to Paris
alignment is much more of a challenge to their basic reason for
being. Some companies have started grappling with this challenge,
but none have met it yet," he said.
The lack of US companies on the list of those that have strong
commitments is especially glaring, said TPI Co-chair Adam Matthews.
"US fossil fuel giants have yet to take meaningful action to reduce
their emissions, and the gap with their European peers is stark,"
he said.
In a survey of 163 companies (up from 141 companies the prior
year), the average score was a 2.7 in 2020, up from 2.6 in 2019.
The scale is 0-4.0, with Level 0 being "unaware" and Level 4
representing a corporate "strategic assessment."
"We see more progress on setting emissions targets and
consequently on Carbon Performance. The share of companies aligned
with Below 2°C has increased from 12% to 18%. Clearly there remains
a long way to go, however," TPI said.
On the positive side, TPI noted that the share of companies
disclosing emissions data in 2020 for FY2019 has increased relative
to 2019 disclosures of FY2018 emissions.
The ratings are based on 19 criteria, such as:
Acknowledgment of climate change
Recognition of risk and opportunity
Policy commitment
Emissions targets (short term and long term)
Disclosure of emissions
Third-party verification of emissions
Process to manage climate risk
Climate risk incorporated into executive compensation
Disclosure of an internal price of carbon
While only three coal mining companies ranked at Level 0, TPI
noted major gaps in governance even among the 50 companies with
Level 4 scores. "For example, just 9% of companies ensure
consistency between their climate change policies and the positions
taken by lobbying groups of which they are a member," it said.
Furthermore, noted Bill Hartnett, stewardship director, ESG
Investment of Aberdeen Strategic Investments, "High management
quality scores are not always linked to adequate climate
ambitions."
TPI noted that it does not see an impact in the factors its
measuring from the global COVID pandemic. "We received a high
response rate from companies to our request for feedback, [and] we
do not see any negative trends in Management Quality or Carbon
Performance that are obviously attributable to Covid-19," it sa
Posted 22 November 2020 by Kevin Adler, Chief Editor
{"items" : [
{"name":"share","enabled":true,"desc":"<strong>Share</strong>","mobdesc":"Share","options":[ {"name":"facebook","url":"https://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3a%2f%2fcleanenergynews.ihsmarkit.com%2fresearch-analysis%2ffew-energy-companies-have-carbon-reduction-goals-aligned.html","enabled":true},{"name":"twitter","url":"https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fcleanenergynews.ihsmarkit.com%2fresearch-analysis%2ffew-energy-companies-have-carbon-reduction-goals-aligned.html&text=Study+says+few+energy+companies+have+carbon+reduction+goals+aligned+with+Paris+Accord+%7c+IHS+Markit+","enabled":true},{"name":"linkedin","url":"https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcleanenergynews.ihsmarkit.com%2fresearch-analysis%2ffew-energy-companies-have-carbon-reduction-goals-aligned.html","enabled":true},{"name":"email","url":"?subject=Study says few energy companies have carbon reduction goals aligned with Paris Accord | IHS Markit &body=http%3a%2f%2fcleanenergynews.ihsmarkit.com%2fresearch-analysis%2ffew-energy-companies-have-carbon-reduction-goals-aligned.html","enabled":true},{"name":"whatsapp","url":"https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=Study+says+few+energy+companies+have+carbon+reduction+goals+aligned+with+Paris+Accord+%7c+IHS+Markit+ http%3a%2f%2fcleanenergynews.ihsmarkit.com%2fresearch-analysis%2ffew-energy-companies-have-carbon-reduction-goals-aligned.html","enabled":true}]}, {"name":"rtt","enabled":true,"mobdesc":"Top"}
]}