Obtain the data you need to make the most informed decisions by accessing our extensive portfolio of information, analytics, and expertise. Sign in to the product or service center of your choice.
Biden seeks big hikes for DOE clean energy, nuke funding
29 May 2021Jeff Beattie
President Joe Biden released details 28 May of his proposed
federal budget for fiscal year 2022, including a whopping $1.9
billion boost for Department of Energy (DOE) work on energy
efficiency and renewable energy as well as a surprisingly hefty
increase for its research and development of nuclear power
technologies, which the administration has increasingly embraced as
key to its decarbonization efforts.
But in a plan that could draw complaints from congressional
Republicans, the administration sought no FY 2022 funding increase
for the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), proposing
a $19.7 billion budget for DOE's semi-autonomous nuclear weapons
agency, the same as the current fiscal year.
Biden was more generous with DOE's politically sensitive nuclear
cleanup program, proposing $6.8 billion for the costly effort to
address dozens of contaminated buildings and vast amounts of
radioactive waste at the department's weapons sites.
In a major new initiative, the budget requested $400 million for
a new Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations (OCED) to "keep
bringing innovative technologies to market," according to a DOE
statement.
"The OCED is envisioned to issue at least one technology-neutral
commercial-scale demonstration solicitation per year focused on a
cross-cutting energy challenge," according to White House budget
documents that said the new office would focus on energy storage in
fiscal year 2022.
"In addition, the office will provide project management support
to [DOE's] applied energy offices on technology scale-up and
demonstration activities funded within their existing programs to
ensure a consistent approach to capital-intensive, late-stage
technology development while ensuring demonstration projects
maximize the creation of good jobs," the documents added.
ARPA-C
The president also earmarked $200 million to establish the new
Advanced Research Projects Agency-Climate (ARPA-C), one of numerous
new programs laced throughout the budget proposal intended to drive
the US towards Biden's goal of producing 100% carbon-free
electricity by 2035.
ARPA-C "will be critical to advancing climate technology
solutions for adaptation, resilience and non-energy emissions
mitigation," DOE said.
And Biden proposed $500 million—a 17% increase—for DOE's
Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy, an incubator designed to
help commercialize unproven but promising clean energy
technologies.
The funding details flesh out the "skinny" budget that Biden
released in early April, which all new presidents do to send an
early signal to Congress on their funding priorities. At that time,
Biden called for DOE to get an overall 10.2% funding hike in fiscal
year 2022 to $46.1 billion and said he would seek a minimum 27 %
increase over current-year DOE spending levels to spur development
and deployment of new clean energy technologies ranging from
advanced reactors to electric vehicles to green hydrogen.
In raw dollar increase terms, the latest budget documents show
the biggest winner among the DOE's programs would be the Office of
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), which would get
$4.73 billion, up 65% from current spending levels. And while
Congress often ignores presidential budget requests, EERE appears
likely to get a substantial funding boost with Democrats
controlling both chambers of Congress and intently focused on
expanding clean energy and accelerating decarbonization.
Biden also proposed creation of "two new Manufacturing USA
institutes to ensure that American workers lead the globe in
building clean energy technology," according to DOE, as well as
calling for $400 million to create jobs renovating homes to save
energy and reduce energy bills for low-income Americans, and $400
million to create well-paying union jobs decarbonizing federal
buildings.
Extra nuclear support
Another big winner is DOE's Office of Nuclear Energy, which
would get a record-high $1.85 billion, a 23% jump over current-year
funding. The increase reflects the Biden administration's focus on
deploying advanced reactors to replace carbon-emitting
generation.
That funding includes a substantial boost for the Versatile Test
Reactor, a proposed fast reactor at the Idaho National Laboratory
that the White House said is needed to provide US capability for
accelerated testing of advanced nuclear fuels, materials,
instrumentation, and sensors. Funded this year at $45 million,
Biden proposed to give that effort $145 million in fiscal 2022.
Biden is also seeking $245 million for a high-profile program to
support demonstration of two advanced reactor technologies under
development by X-Energy and TerraPower within the next six
years.
And on a controversial and long-delayed DOE program, the
president sought modest funding for a "consent-based siting
process" to find a host community for consolidated interim storage
for the US' used nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste.
That is one of the few things the Biden administration has said
about its plans for the US' long-festering nuclear waste problem,
which was worsened by the Obama administration's killing of the
planned Yucca Mountain repository in Nevada, a decision continued
by President Donald Trump, both for political reasons.
However, the budget appears to allocate only $11 million to
launch the consent-based siting process, including $3 million in
leftover funds and $8 million from the Nuclear Waste Fund, down
from about $20 million in total in fiscal 2021.
Meanwhile, the proposed budget would set aside a healthy $327
million for DOE's Office of Electricity, $115 million more than in
the current budget, with much of that increase aimed at speeding
deployment of storage needed to support growth of the intermittent
renewable power on which Biden's climate goals depend. More than a
third of the office's budget—$119 million—would go to
storage R&D.
And in a key priority for the administration, the proposal would
jack up funding for DOE's Office of Cybersecurity, Energy Security,
and Emergency Response (CESER) by 30% year on year to $204 million.
That proposed increase comes with gasoline prices still elevated
from the recent ransomware shutdown of the Colonial Pipeline, and
on the same day Microsoft warned that Russian hackers behind the
December SolarWinds cyber incursion had resumed attacks on US
federal agencies and nonprofits.
Office of Fossil Energy revamp
Also getting a budget boost—and a somewhat revised
mission—is DOE's renamed Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon
Management. Long known as the Office of Fossil Energy, the unit
previously was focused largely on production technologies while
also addressing carbon sequestration and storage. But under Biden's
proposal, going forward, the office would focus almost entirely on
reducing emissions from fossil fuel-fired plants and helping
communities hurt by plant shutdowns as the nation moves to
emission-free power, according to DOE's budget summary. For that
work, the office would get $890 million, $140 million more than its
current-year funding.
As for NNSA, Biden's proposal for flat funding in fiscal 2022
contrasts sharply with the hefty $3.1 billion increase that
Congress gave NNSA last year when the Trump administration said the
agency needed significantly more money to remain on track with
hugely expensive modernization efforts for DOE's nuclear weapons
production facilities and the nation's nuclear warheads, which both
date from the Cold War.
Prior to approval of that increase, however, the NNSA chief
under Trump—Lisa Gordon-Hagerty—said it was insufficient
and sought support from key GOP senators in seeking more money.
However, her criticism of the funding levels proposed by former
Secretary of Energy Dan Brouillette ended up getting her fired.
Biden did propose a slight increase for NNSA's weapons
activities program to $15.48 billion, up from the current $15.34
billion, but that modest hike appeared to raise questions about
whether the administration was fully on-board with expensive
projects to increase DOE's plutonium pit production capacity.